1/ Would a person who adheres to the principle of rights consider it ethical for Stilton not to disclose the potential risk of cancellation to investors? why or why not?
2/ Using Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative, are the actions of RightLiving,Inc, ethical? why or why not?
3/ Under utilitarianism, are Stilton’s actions ethical? why or why not? what difference does it make if most are f the policies are legitimate and will be paid rather than being fraudulently procured and void?
4/ Using the business process pragmatism step discussed in this chapter, discuss the decision process Stilton should use in deciding whether to disclose the risk of fraudulent policies to potential investors.
Note :answer these questions
use your own and simple words without copying from google